Appeal No. 1999-0493 Application No. 08/649,504 OPINION The examiner finds that appellants admit that the claimed assemblies with force bearing members made from silicone rubber are known but that there is no admission that the specifically claimed room temperature-curable silicone rubber is known (Answer, page 3). Accordingly, the examiner applies Yoshino for the disclosure of a room temperature-curable organopolysiloxane composition which is “similar” to the composition claimed (id.). From these findings, the examiner concludes that it would have been obvious “to utilize [the] disclosure of Yoshino et al to produce known electronic assemblies at room temperature.” Answer, page 4. Even assuming arguendo that the room temperature-curable organopolysiloxane composition of Yoshino is the same as the claimed force bearing member composition, we determine that the examiner has not presented any convincing evidence or reasoning to make the proposed combination (see the Brief, pages 4-7). “We have noted that evidence of a suggestion, teaching, or motivation to combine may flow from the prior art references themselves, the knowledge of one of ordinary skill in the art, 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007