The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte YASUHIRO UCHIDA, TAKASHI KOJIMA, MASAHIRO HAMAYA, and MINORU OTA _____________ Appeal No. 1999-0555 Application No. 08/593,330 ______________ HEARD: NOVEMBER 29, 2001 _______________ Before GARRIS, LIEBERMAN, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to allow claims 1-11 as amended subsequent to the final rejection. These are all of the claims in the application. The subject matter on appeal relates to an oxygen concentration detector. With reference to the appellants’Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007