Ex parte ROBBINS - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today was not written for publication and is not                       
               binding precedent of the Board.                                        
                                                       Paper No. 13                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                  ________________                                    
                             Ex parte DANIEL C. ROBBINS                               
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 1999-0564                                  
                               Application 08/398,834                                 
                                  ________________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                  ________________                                    
          Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative                  
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                 
          from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 2-11, 13 and 22-              
          31.  Claims 1, 12, 14-21 and 32 had previously been cancelled.              
          Claim 33 was indicated by the examiner to contain allowable                 
          subject matter.  Appellant indicates that claims 6-11, 23-25                
          and 29-31 are not being appealed [brief, page 2].  Therefore,               
                                         -1-                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007