The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 13 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte DANIEL C. ROBBINS ________________ Appeal No. 1999-0564 Application 08/398,834 ________________ ON BRIEF ________________ Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 2-11, 13 and 22- 31. Claims 1, 12, 14-21 and 32 had previously been cancelled. Claim 33 was indicated by the examiner to contain allowable subject matter. Appellant indicates that claims 6-11, 23-25 and 29-31 are not being appealed [brief, page 2]. Therefore, -1-Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007