Ex parte ROBBINS - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-0564                                                        
          Application 08/398,834                                                      


               wherein the touch sensitive input pad generates one or                 
          more signals corresponding to one or more different pressures               
          applied  to on the pad by the operator.                                     
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Bowen                         5,502,460          Mar. 26, 1996              
          (filed Aug. 02,                                                             
          1994)                                                                       

          “Combined-User Interface for Computers, Television, Video                   
          Recorders, and Telephone, etc.,” IBM Technical Disclosure                   
          Bulletin, Vol. 33, No. 3B, August 1990, pages 116-118                       
          (hereinafter IBM).                                                          
          Claims 2-5, 13, 22 and 26-28 stand rejected under 35                        
          U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers               
          Bowen in view of IBM.                                                       
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the                        
          examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for                 
          the respective details thereof.                                             
          OPINION                                                                     
          We have carefully considered the subject matter on                          
          appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the                      
          evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support              
          for the rejection.  We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into              
          consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellant’s                    
          arguments set forth in the brief along with the examiner’s                  
                                         -3-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007