Appeal No. 1999-0678
Application No. 08/462,691
paragraph, as lacking written descriptive support for the subject
matter presently claimed;
2) Claims 18, 19, and 35 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over the combined disclosures of either Meredith or
Sundman, Soteland, Reeve with or without Singh, Kimura, and
Coste;4
3) Claims 20 through 22, 24 through 27, 29, 30, 32, and 34
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined
disclosures of Sundman, Soteland, and Reeve;
4) Claims 20 through 22, 24 through 27, 29, 30, 32, and 34
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined
disclosures of Meredith, Soteland, and Reeve, with or without
Singh, Kimura, and Coste;
5) Claim 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the
combined disclosures of either Meredith or Sundman, Soteland, and
Reeve with or without Singh, Kimura, or Coste;
6) Claim 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the
combined disclosures of either Meredith or Sundman, Soteland and
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007