Ex Parte HENRICSON et al - Page 7



          Appeal No. 1999-0678                                                        
          Application No. 08/462,691                                                  

          that the presently claimed subject matter is limited to using               
          ozone as the only bleaching agent in bleaching cellulose pulp in            
          an aqueous suspension at a medium consistency of 5-25%.  See                
          claim 18.  In other words, the claims on appeal expressly                   
          preclude any bleaching action by any and all agents (including              
          oxygen) except for ozone.  The Lindholm declaration, which was              
          not considered in the previous Appeal, states (page 2, paragraph            
          2) that:                                                                    
                    In 1989-1991 (and even today) one of ordinary skill in            
               the art of ozone bleaching would know that ozone bleaching             
               takes place at acidic conditions, typically a pH of about 2-           
               3.5.  At the acidic conditions that ozone bleaching                    
               typically takes place, oxygen is not a bleaching agent.  It            
               is merely a carrier gas for ozone.  Particularly at perhaps            
               the most common pH for ozone bleaching, about three, oxygen            
               does not act as a bleaching agent but rather only as a                 
               carrier gas for ozone.                                                 
          Thus, the record before us is substantially different from the              
          record that was before the previous merits panel.                           
               Having interpreted the claims on appeal in the above manner,           
          we have carefully reviewed all of the evidence proffered by both            
          the examiner and appellants.  This review leads us to conclude              











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007