THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2)
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte WALTER W. MOSHER, JR.
__________________
Appeal No. 1999-0758
Application 08/784,180
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to allow claims 1 through 3, all
of the claims remaining in the application, as amended subsequent to the final rejection.
Appellant’s invention pertains to an identification bracelet. A basic understanding
of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, a copy of which
appears in the APPENDIX to the brief (Paper No. 16).
As evidence of anticipation and obviousness, the examiner has applied the
documents listed below:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007