Ex Parte MOSHER, - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1999-0758                                                                                         
              Application 08/784,180                                                                                       

              Solon                        4,991,337                           Feb. 12, 1991                               
              McKillip                     5,145,211                           Sep.  8, 1992                               


                     The following rejections are before us for review.                                                    


                     Claim 2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being                             
              indefinite.                                                                                                  


                     Claims 1 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by                        
              Solon.                                                                                                       


                     Claim 2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                           
              Solon in view of McKillip.                                                                                   


                     The full text of the examiner’s rejections and response to the argument                               
              presented by appellant appears in the answer (Paper No. 17), while the complete                              
              statement of appellant’s argument can be found in the brief (Paper No. 16).                                  







                                                            2                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007