Appeal No. 1999-0758 Application 08/784,180 Solon 4,991,337 Feb. 12, 1991 McKillip 5,145,211 Sep. 8, 1992 The following rejections are before us for review. Claim 2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite. Claims 1 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Solon. Claim 2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Solon in view of McKillip. The full text of the examiner’s rejections and response to the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer (Paper No. 17), while the complete statement of appellant’s argument can be found in the brief (Paper No. 16). 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007