The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte FRANCOIS HEBERT ____________ Appeal No. 1999-0848 Application No. 08/634,310 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, BARRETT, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 2-6, 8-12, and 29-36. Claims 1, 7, and 13-28 were canceled earlier in the prosecution. In the Answer, in which the prior art rejection of claims 2-6, 8, and 10-12 is maintained, the Examiner at page 3 indicates the allowance of claims 9 and 29-36, as well as the withdrawal of the 35 U.S.C.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007