Ex parte DESBLANCS et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1999-0877                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/204,441                                                                                                             


                 screen.  Further understanding of the invention can be                                                                                 
                 obtained by the following claim.                                                                                                       
                          1.  A method of delivering a telephone number associated                                                                      
                 with a telephone subscription to the user of a telephone set,                                                                          
                 use of said set requiring the user to provide subscription                                                                             
                 identification data stored in a data medium held by the owner                                                                          
                 of said subscription and co-operating with said telephone set,                                                                         
                 wherein the telephone number is stored in the data medium,                                                                             
                 wherein the data medium is removably coupled to said telephone                                                                         
                 set, and wherein the telephone number only then is transferred                                                                         
                 from the coupled data medium into the telephone set at the                                                                             
                 request of the user, to be delivered to the user of said set,                                                                          
                 and wherein, after the telephone number has been transferred                                                                           
                 into the telephone set, it is displayed on display means                                                                               
                 provided in said telephone set.                                                                                                        
                          The Examiner relies on the following references:                                                                              
                 Rasmussen                                             5,134,717                                    July 28,                            
                 1992                                                                                                                                   
                 Endo et al. (Endo)                           5,467,389                                    Nov. 14, 1995                                
                 Nokia LX11C/LX11T Brochure, May 1990, pages 1-4                                                                                        
                          Claims 1 to 3 and 5 to 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                                      
                 § 103 as being unpatentable over Rasmussen, Endo and Nokia.                                                                            
                          Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants and the                                                                        
                 Examiner, we make reference to the briefs  and the answer for             2                                                            
                 their respective details thereof.                                                                                                      


                          2A reply brief was filed as Paper No. 28 and the Examiner                                                                     
                 noted its entry without any further response.  See Paper No.                                                                           
                 29.                                                                                                                                    
                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007