Appeal No. 1999-0877
Application No. 08/204,441
obvious ... to include subscriber information [in Ramussen]
and include a way to display the phone number, in order to
prevent fraudulent use by identifying each subscriber within
the network and in order to verify the telephone number that
the user is allocated, respectively [in view of such teachings
of Endo and Nokia]."
Appellants argue, reply brief at page 3, that "when
considering Rasmussen disclosure in its entirety, the type of
'other information' to which the concept taught by Rasmussen
may be applied, is only the information that is automatically
dialed when accessed. In contrast, Applicant's (sic) claimed
invention
involves displaying a user's own telephone number. It is only
common sense that the user will not try to dial his own
telephone number from his own telephone set." Appellents
further argue, reply brief at page 5, that "[s]ince the PSI is
secret, the PID is not to be published, and cannot be
considered as equivalent
to the telephone number within the meaning of Applicant's
invention." Appellants further argue, reply brief at page 5,
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007