Appeal No. 1999-0890
Application 07/575,096
we will not sustain the rejection of claims 119-123 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Dunkley when taken
with Iggulden and Johnston, as Johnston does not provide the
claim limitations found absent in the above analysis of their
respective parent claims 17, 27, 78, 84 and 91, and the Examiner
has only applied Johnston to the specific limitations added by
these dependent claims.
We have not sustained the rejection of claims 17, 19-24, 26,
27, 53-60 and 70-123 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, the
Examiner's decision is reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOSEPH L. DIXON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
16
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007