Appeal No. 1999-0891 Page 3 Application No. 08/676,484 Tsukizoe, Japanese Published Patent Application 02- 209100, Aug. 20, 1990 . 1 The examiner rejects claims 15, 20, and 24-26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over Morris in view of Tsukizoe. He also rejects claims 16-19 under § 103 as being obvious over Morris in view of Tsukizoe further in view of Frey and claim 22 under § 103 as being obvious over Morris in view of Tsukizoe further in view of Sherman. Rather than reiterate the arguments of the appellants or examiner in toto, we refer the reader to the briefs and answer for the respective details thereof. OPINION After considering the record, we are persuaded that the examiner erred in rejecting claims 15-22 and 24-26. Accordingly, we reverse. We begin by considering the examiner's rejection and the appellants' argument. 1A copy of the translation prepared by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is attached. We will refer to the translation by page number.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007