Ex parte MOSER et al. - Page 2




                     Appeal No. 1999-0978                                                                                                               Page 2                         
                     Application No. 08/533,944                                                                                                                                        


                                                                             THE INVENTION                                                                                             

                                According to Appellants, the invention relates to a process of thermally treating a rail head to                                                       

                     obtain a fine-pearlite structure while avoiding undesirable hardness of the thinner web portion of the rail                                                       

                     (Brief, page 2).  Claim 6 is illustrative:                                                                                                                        

                                                     6.  A method for the thermal treatment of a rail head of a rail in which cooling is                                               
                                           carried out, comprising:                                                                                                                    
                                                     immersing said rail head at an initial temperature of above 720EC in a                                                            
                                                     cooling agent that contains a synthetic cooling agent additive, and                                                               
                                                     withdrawing said rail head from the cooling agent upon obtaining a                                                                
                                                     surface temperature of said rail head of between 450 to 550EC                                                                     
                                           without temperature equalization over the entire cross-section of said rail head.                                                           

                                                                              THE EVIDENCE                                                                                             

                                As evidence of unpatentability, the Examiner relies upon the following prior art references:                                                           
                     Iwasaki et al. (Iwasaki)         1                               55-2768                                    Jan. 10, 1980                                         
                     (published Japanese Pat. Application)                                                                                                                             

                     Moser et al. (Moser)                                             1,205,729                                  Jun. 10, 1986                                         
                     (Canadian Patent)                                                                                                                                                 

                     Teramoto et al. (Teramoto)                                       1-290717                                   Nov. 22, 1989                                         
                     (published Japanese Pat. Application)                                                                                                                             



                                1Unless otherwise noted, references to this document are to the English language translation                                                           
                     provided by The Ralph McElroy Translation Company.  The Examiner obtained the translation in                                                                      
                     November 1998, a date after the Brief and Answer had been written.  As Appellants’ representative                                                                 
                     informed us at the oral hearing that a copy of this translation had not yet been received, a copy                                                                 
                     accompanies this decision.                                                                                                                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007