Appeal No. 1999-1052 Page 7
Application No. 08/604,841
We reach the same conclusion, for the same reasons, with regard to the rejection of
dependent claims 10 and 15 as being unpatentable over the combined teachings of
Frankeny and Crowe.
SUMMARY
None of the rejections are sustained.
The decision of the examiner is REVERSED.
REVERSED
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
NEAL E. ABRAMS ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
)
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
NEA:lbg
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007