The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIROYASU SUZUE, KENICHI KAMEDA, HIDEYUKI NAITOU,
TOMOYOSHI TSURUFUJI and NOBUAKI TAKAMATSU
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1061
Application No. 08/568,337
____________
HEARD: November 28, 2000
____________
Before ABRAMS, McQUADE, and LAZARUS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-4, 10
and 14-28. Claims 5-9 and 11-13 have been withdrawn from consideration by the
examiner as being directed to a non-elected invention. No claims have been allowed.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007