The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 38 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte KOHEI NISHIYAMA _____________ Appeal No. 1999-1091 Application No. 08/273,790 ______________ HEARD: March 22, 2001 _______________ Before HAIRSTON, DIXON and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to 14, all of the claims pending in the application. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 23), claim 1 was amended. BACKGROUND The disclosed invention is directed to a radio telephone system having a radio telephone with an answering machine that provides tailored responses to incoming calls without any additional action from the caller. The selection of a response is determined by the phone number associated with the incoming call. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007