Appeal No. 1999-1091
Application No. 08/273,790
Patent Appeals and Interferences, unless good cause is shown.” Inasmuch as
appellant has not argued the inadequacies of the rejection as framed by the
examiner, any arguments that appellant could have presented are deemed to be
waived. Thus, the obviousness rejection of claims 1 to 14 is sustained.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 to 14 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH L. DIXON ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
kwh/vsh
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007