Ex parte SHU et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-1126                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/722,486                                                  


               sensing amplifier having a pair of input terminals                     
               connected to a pair of bit lines, said differential                    
               current sensing amplifier having a pair of input                       
               transistors connected to said bit line pair and                        
               means for biasing said input transistors into                          
               conduction, and wherein neither of said input                          
               transistors is cut off during reading or writing                       
               access to said memory.                                                 

               The references relied on in rejecting the claims follow:               
               Sasaki et al. (Sasaki)   5,126,974           June 30,                  
               1992                                                                   
                                             (filed Jan. 16, 1990)                    
               Nogle et al. (Nogle)     5,229,967           July 20,                  
               1993                                                                   
                                             (filed Sep.  4, 1990)                    
               Taguchi                  5,339,273           Aug. 16,                  
               1994                                                                   
                                             (filed Dec. 13, 1991).                   
          Claims 4, 5, 12, and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                    
          102(e) as anticipated by Taguchi.  Claims 4, 12, and 13 stand               
          rejected under § 102(e) as anticipated by Sasaki or Nogle.                  
          Claim 5  stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious                
          over Sasaki or Nogle.  Rather than repeat the arguments of the              
          appellants or examiner in toto, we refer the reader to the                  
          brief and answer for the respective details thereof.                        


                                       OPINION                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007