Appeal No. 1999-1136 Application No. 08/771,373 617 F.2d at 276, 205 USPQ at 219; Ornitz, 351 F.2d at 1016-17, 147 USPQ at 286; Aller, 220 F.2d at 456, 105 USPQ at 235. As proof of criticality, appellants have submitted the declaration under 37 CFR § 1.132 of John Mariner, one of the appellants (filed Nov. 18, 1997), to show "that high density PBN is superior to low density PBN relative to useful life" (brief, page 8). Before considering Mr. Mariner's declaration, we take notice of the fact that Basche discloses that the coating process is especially efficient when the reactor temperature is 2000° C. (col. 3, line 57), thereby expressly suggesting to one of ordinary skill that a temperature of 2000° C. be used. According to appellants' specification at page 4, lines 4 to 7, higher density (i.e., at least 2.19 gm/cc) PBN may be achieved by keeping the reactor temperature in the range of 1950 to 2000° C. Therefore, if one of ordinary skill were to coat the boat of Morris using the 2000° C. reactor temperature recommended by Basche it would appear that, according to appellants' disclosure, the coating would inherently have a density of at least 2.19 gm/cc. Inasmuch as the resulting 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007