Appeal No. 1999-1136 Application No. 08/771,373 coating as disclosed by Tanji, and thus would meet all the limitations of claim 3. Rejection (2) therefore will be sustained. Rejection (3) Claim 4 reads: 4. A flash evaporator vaporization boat as defined in claim 3 having an intermediate layer between the coating of PBN and said graphite body. In considering rejection (4), we interpret the recited "intermediate layer" as requiring a layer composed of a substance other than PBN, this being consistent with appellants' disclosure (page 4, line 11 et seq.) and with the apparent interpretation placed on this claim by appellants and the examiner. The examiner states on page 5 of the answer that appellants' argument concerning Finicle is not persuasive because: The claimed invention calls for having an intermediate layer such as pyrolitic graphite between a PBN coating and a graphite body. Finicle shows in Figure 1, an intermediate layer such as pyrolitic graphite shown as element 8 provided between a PBN coating and a graphite body. Also, Finicle is in the same field of endeavor which is in the field of using PBN coating to insulated heated vessels or crucibles. 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007