Ex parte EWASYSHYN et al. - Page 9




              Appeal No. 1999-1162                                                                                       
              Application No. 08/427,837                                                                                 



              35 U.S.C. § 102(e)                                                                                         
                     Claims 9, 19 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as unpatentable over                    
              Wathen.                                                                                                    
                     The examiner relies on Wathen as describing a recombinantly produced PIV3 HN                        
              and F, or HNF chimeric glycoproteins which are immunogenic and purified by ConA or                         
              lectin affinity chromatography, and may be admixed with aluminum phosphate as adjuvant                     
              for purposes of vaccine administration.  Answer, page 6.                                                   
                     Wathen does not describe a “mixture of HN and F glycoproteins”, as required by                      
              claim 9, as the disclosure of Wathen appears to be limited to a single, recombinant,                       
              chimeric glycoprotein comprised of HN linked to F.  Wathen, column 2, lines 49-50, column                  
              8, lines 1-10, and column 16, lines 43-47.                                                                 
                     Thus, Wathen does not anticipate the claimed composition and the rejection of                       
              Claims 9, 19 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as unpatentable over Wathen is reversed.                      


              35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph                                                                           
                     Claims 9, 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as the                     
              specification, as originally filed, does not provide support for the invention as now claimed.             





                                                           9                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007