Ex parte MAYRAND - Page 1




                                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                                                 
                                                   publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                           
                                                                                                                   Paper No. 27                                     
                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                  
                                                                       ____________                                                                                 
                                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                  
                                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                   
                                                                       ____________                                                                                 
                                                            Ex parte PAUL E. MAYRAND                                                                                
                                                                     ____________                                                                                   
                                                                 Appeal No. 1999-1266                                                                               
                                                              Application No. 08/859,4721                                                                           
                                                                       ____________                                                                                 
                                                               HEARD: August 07, 2001                                                                               
                                                                       ____________                                                                                 
                   Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ROBINSON, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                      
                   ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                           

                                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                  

                            This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final                                                        
                   rejection of claims 16 and 17, which are the only claims pending in the application.                                                             
                            Claim 16 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows:                                                          
                            16.       A method for performing combined PCR amplification and hybridization                                                          
                   probing comprising the steps of:                                                                                                                 





                            1This application is directed to subject matter related to that which is claimed in                                                     
                   Application No. 08/826,538, which is the subject of Appeal No. 1999-1436 currently                                                               
                   pending before the Board.  We have considered these two appeals together.                                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007