Appeal No. 1999-1266 Application No. 08/859,472 Ground of Rejection Claims 16 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Link, Parkhurst, Heller and Abramson. We reverse. Background The applicant describes the presently claimed invention at page 3 of the specification as being directed to methods and reagents useful for the combined amplification and hybridization probe detection of amplified nucleic acid target sequences in a single reaction vessel. At page 4, applicant describes a method and reagents for the amplification and probe detection where the polymerase is not required to have 5'->3' exonuclease activity. Discussion Claim Interpretation Claim 16 is directed to a method for performing combined PCR amplification and hybridization probing comprising contacting the target nucleic acid sequence with PCR reagents, including at least two PCR primers, in combination with an oligonucleotide probe in the presence of a polymerase enzyme substantially lacking any 5'->3' exonuclease activity. The claim provides that the oligonucleotide probe has a fluorescer molecule attached to a first end and a quencher molecule attached to a second end such that the 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007