Ex parte KISER et al. - Page 3




                Appeal No. 1999-1307                                                                                                      
                Application No. 08/442,035                                                                                                

                                                             Background                                                                   
                        Claim 1 is directed to a test strip for determining the concentration of an analyte in a                          
                body fluid comprising a cover sheet having an elongated window cut through it, a lamellar                                 
                membrane adjacent to the cover sheet which extends across and into the window and                                         
                contains the reagent which reacts with the analyte present in the sample to produce a                                     
                detectable color change, a porous sheet in fluid communication with the membrane, having                                  
                a porous, enlarged pillow portion and a compressed portion wherein the pillow portion is                                  
                substantially aligned with the window and a backing sheet adjoining the porous sheet and                                  
                having a sample port cut through it.                                                                                      
                                               The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103                                                        
                        The examiner's rejection of claims 1 - 17 depends, solely, on the teachings of Blatt.                             
                While we would agree that Blatt describes a device which provides a means for dealing                                     
                with the problem of excess sample so that excess liquid does not interfere with obtaining a                               
                proper reading (Answer, page 4) which, at least in part, reflects one of the benefit                                      
                attributed to the present claimed invention, (Specification, page 2, second paragraph), we                                
                do not agree with the examiner's stated conclusion that (Answer, page 5):                                                 
                        [i]t would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of                                   
                        the invention was made to have both a pillow portion and a compressed                                             
                        portion of the porous layer in the test strip of Blatt because Blatt teaches                                      
                        various forms of porous reagent layers and teaches an absorbent portion to                                        
                        absorb excess sample.                                                                                             



                                                                    3                                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007