Appeal No. 1999-1335
Application No. 08/463,437
For these reasons and those set forth in the answer, we
affirm the examiner’s rejection under the judicially created
doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting of claims 47
through 57, 64 through 66, and 68 through 71 as unpatentable over
claims 1 through 14 of the '233 patent.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007