Appeal No. 1999-1427 Application No. 08/372,429 Summary We reverse the rejection under 35 U.S.C § 112, first paragraph, because the examiner has not met his burden of showing that the presumptively enabling specification is inadequate to teach those skilled in the art how to practice the claimed method. REVERSED William F. Smith ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Toni R. Scheiner ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Eric Grimes ) Administrative Patent Judge ) EG/dm 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007