The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GREGORY J. CAPONE,
RICHARD M. GARDNER,
MATTHEW M. MOHEBBI,
WALTER R. KEPLEY, III,
JOHN D. KENYON,
and
DAVID A. ROOS
_____________
Appeal No. 1999-1515
Application No. 08/451,719
______________
HEARD: APRIL 25, 2001
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO, and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection
of claims 18-27 and 30-44. Claims 1-17 have been canceled and
claims 28 and 29 have been allowed.
The disclosed invention relates to a two-way mobile
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007