Appeal No. 1999-1543
Application No. 08/456,762
a second biasing condition in which the gripping arms
are resiliently biased in a second direction for releasing the
cartridge; and
setting means for selectively setting the biasing condition
of the biasing means for gripping or releasing the cartridge.
The Examiner relies on the following references:
Wanger et al. (Wanger) 5,014,255 May 7, 1991
Hug et al. (Hug) 5,128,912 July 7, 1992
Belo Urban Des Tech. (Belo)2 1,298,176 Mar. 23, 1987
(Russian)
Claims 1, 13, 25 and 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
over Wanger in view of Belo, while claims 2, 7 to 9, 14 and 19 to
21 stand rejected over Wanger in view of Belo and Hug.
Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant and the
Examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for their
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have considered the rejections advanced by the Examiner
and the supporting arguments. We have, likewise, reviewed the
Appellant's arguments set forth in the brief.
We reverse.
2
2 A copy of the English translation is enclosed with this
decision.
33
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007