Ex parte CARLSON - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-1557                                                        
          Application 08/650,397                                                      



          lines 6-8.  When the copying completes, the redundant database              
          is fully recovered into a concurrently consistent state and                 
          the continuing incoming update operations in the redundant                  
          database system serve to maintain the concurrent consistency                
          of the redundant database until another failure occurs.                     
          Specification, page 4, lines 8-11.  The invention requires                  
          interchangeability of the operating status of each of                       


          two database systems and identifiability of each database                   
          record by some unique Record Identification Key (RIK).                      
          Specification, page 4, lines 11-14.                                         
                    Appellant’s representative claim 1 recites as                     
          follows:                                                                    
                    1.  In a transaction processing system including                  
          first and second database systems for processing queries and                
          updates, each said database system having a database in which               
          are stored  a plurality of records, each having an (sic)                    
          unique Record Identification Key (RIK), wherein said second                 
          database system database is a replica of said first database                
          system database,    a method for recovering from failure of                 
          said second database system, said method comprising the steps               
          of:                                                                         
                    (a) repairing said failure and restarting operation               
          of said second database system;                                             


                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007