Ex parte KANNO - Page 5







             Appeal No. 1999-1634                                                                                   
             Application 08/729,399                                                                                 



             "one different divided voltage" is a contradiction in terms, since a voltage cannot be                 
             different from itself."                                                                                
                    Appellant’s implicit view in the brief and reply brief that the claim requires in effect a      
             plurality of taps is consistent with the showings of the circuits in Figures 2-4 of the                
             disclosed invention.  The examiner’s additional view that nothing prevents the nodes at the            
             outer ends of resistors 21 and 23 in Figure 2 of McClure from being considered taps is                 
             misplaced.  The node between resistors 21 and 25 as well as the node between resistors                 
             23 and 27 in this Figure clearly are not "tapped" such as to feed an output directly to the            
             base of transistor 28 in Figure 2.                                                                     


















                                                         5                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007