Ex Parte MAJUMDAR et al - Page 8




              Appeal No. 1999-1651                                                                                        
              Application No. 08/775,308                                                                                  


              Figure 23 discloses a plurality of first terminals each having a first end and a second                     
              end, and that at least one first end is electrically connected to said at least one power                   
              device as recited in the language of claim 41.                                                              
                     The examiner argues that the diagrams in Figure 23 are inadequately taught and                       
              that there is no support member and no common structure to fit the diagrams together.                       
              (See answer at page 3.)  We disagree with the examiner.  While Figure 23 is only                            
              briefly labeled, it is clear that there is support for the claimed invention, and the linkage               
              between the diagrams would appear to be the hidden lines that show the heat sink                            
              under the support which holds the chips 2200 and 2100.  The examiner further                                





              questions whether there is a package that seals the heat sink, power device, control                        
              element, and the terminals.  (See answer at page 3.)  Here, we disagree with the                            
              examiner’s claim interpretation.  The heat sink is on the lower portion of the support and                  
              the other elements are on the upper surface which is sealed.  We find that Fig. 23                          
              discloses this claimed feature with one end of the terminals within the sealed area.  The                   
              examiner maintains that various embodiments cannot be intermingled.  (See brief at                          
              page 3.)  We disagree with the examiner’s generalization.  In many instances the skilled                    
              artisan must look to the disclosure as a whole since there is not a need to                                 

                                                            8                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007