Appeal No. 1999-1681
Application 08/634,830
(5) Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, and 12 through 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as
based on a non-enabling disclosure.
DISPOSITION
On consideration of the record, we find that the examiner's rejections have little
merit. For the reasons succinctly stated in applicants' Appeal Brief and Reply Brief, we
shall not sustain any of the prior art or non-prior art rejections. The examiner's decision,
rejecting claims 1, 2, 5, 6, and 12 through 16, is reversed.
REVERSED
)
Sherman D. Winters )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
William F. Smith )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
Donald E. Adams )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
Millen, White, Zelano, and Branigan
Arlington Courthouse Plaza I Suite 1400
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007