Ex parte NISHIZAWA et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-1687                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/152,102                                                  


          is periodically thinned to facilitate rolling of the device.                
          An understanding of the invention can be derived from a                     
          reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced as follows:               
               1.  A two-dimensional color display device allowing                    
          selective generation and display of a broad range of colors,                
          said device comprising:                                                     
               a plurality of luminous elements each having luminous                  
          wavelengths different from each other collectively disposed on              
          a flexible substrate in an N x M matrix arrangement, said                   
          flexible substrate being periodically thinned so as to                      
          facilitate rolling of the device, at least one of emission                  
          intensity and a luminous color of each of said luminous                     
          elements being separately controllable from those of other                  
          ones of said luminous elements, said controllability being                  
          conducted on the basis of selective variation of at least one               
          of a time series pulse intensity and a width which is applied               
          to said luminous element, such that each luminous element                   
          emits a desired emission intensity and luminous color, and a                
          collective emission intensity and luminous color of adjacent                
          ones of said luminous elements effect display of a desired                  
          color, one of said luminous elements being controlled so that               
          the emission intensity thereof is different from the emission               
          intensity of at least one other luminous element when said one              
          and said at least one other luminous element emit light, and                
          wherein N and M are each an integer not less than 2; and                    
               signal wiring connected to said luminous elements, said                
          signal wiring being arranged in a matrix.                                   

               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Scheib                     4,439,818             Mar. 27, 1984              
          Havel                      4,965,561             Oct. 23, 1990              
                                   (Effecive filing date: Jan. 08, 1986)              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007