Appeal No. 1999-1730 Application No. 08/478,205 1. An isolated DNA molecule comprising a segment having a sequence which encodes a synthetic mutant beetle luciferase comprising an amino acid sequence that difeers from that of the corresponding wild-type luciferase by at least one amino acid substitution, the position of the amino acid substitution corresponding to a position in the amino acid sequence of LucPplGR of SEQ ID NO: 2 selected from the group consisting of position 215, 224, 232, 236, 237, 242, 244, 245, 248, 282, 283 and 348, wherein the mutant luciferase produces bioluminescence having a shift in wavelength of peak intensity of at least 1 nanometer relative to the bioluminescence produced by the wild- type luciferase. 33. An isolated DNA molecule comprising a segment having a sequence which encodes a mutant beetle luciferase having an amino acid sequence that differs from that of the corresponding wild-type luciferase LucPplGR by at least one amino acid substitution, wherein the encoded mutant luciferase is selected from the group consisting of LucPplGR-R223L, -R223Q, -R223M, -R223H, -L238R, -L238M, L238Q, -L238S, -L238D, -S247H, -S247T, -S257Y, -S247F and the encoded mutant luciferase produces bioluminescence having a shift in wavelength of peak intensity of a least 1 nanometer relative to the bioluminescence produced by the wild-type luciferase. The examiner relies on the following references: Wood (Wood (1990)), “Luc Genes: Introduction of Colour into Bioluminescence Assays,” Journal of Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence, Vol. 5, pp. 107- 114 (1990) Wood (Wood dissertation) “Luciferases of Luminous Beetles: Evolution, Color Variation, and Applications,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at San Diego, 1989. Claims 1-17, 20-23, 25-27, 29, and 33 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over the Wood dissertation and Wood (1990). We reverse. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007