Appeal No. 1999-1780
Application No. 08/651,630
not established that the claimed subject matter of any of claims
33, 42 or 49 as a whole would have been obvious in view of the
teachings of the applied references, the standing rejection of
claims 33, 42 and 49, as well as of claims 34, 43 and 50 that
depend, respectively, therefrom cannot be sustained.
Summary
The rejection of claims 28-32, 35-41, 44-47, 53 and 54 as
being anticipated by Lohrey is reversed as to claims 28-32, 35-
41, 44, 45, 53 and 54, but is affirmed as to claims 46 and 47.
The rejection of claim 48 as being unpatentable over Lohrey
in view of Rivalto is reversed.
The rejection of claims 33, 34, 42, 43, 49 and 50 as being
unpatentable over Lohrey in view of Yehuda is reversed.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
15
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007