Ex parte DANFORTH - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication         
                                   and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                                                                                     Paper No. 16               
                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                                _____________                                                   
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                _____________                                                   
                                        Ex parte SCOTT H. DANFORTH                                              
                                                _____________                                                   
                                            Appeal No. 1999-1842                                                
                                          Application No. 08/042,930                                            
                                               ______________                                                   
                                                  ON BRIEF                                                      
                                              _______________                                                   
             Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and LALL,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
             KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                

                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  

                   This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-21, all of the             
             pending claims.                                                                                    
                   The invention is directed to the specification of a metaclass for an object-oriented         
             class object while insuring that the metaclass will fully support class instances                  






                                                       1                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007