Appeal No. 1999-1842 Application No. 08/042,930 on the side of appellant since, in our view, the examiner has not convincingly shown us that a metaclass is unequivocally the same as a meta-object in the face of appellant’s strenuous rebuttal that the terms are not equivalent. The examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-21 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed. REVERSED ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JERRY SMITH ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) PARSHOTAM S. LALL ) Administrative Patent Judge ) eak/vsh 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007