Appeal No. 1999-1895
Application No. 08/363,315
has been determined to be lacking from De Gaudenzi.
Accordingly, we will reverse the rejection of claim 13 and its
dependent, claim 14, for the same reasons given by the
examiner for indicating the allowability of independent claim
9.
The claims remaining, claims 5 through 8, do not include
a second phase shifting step or means. However, independent
claim 5 does recite, in pertinent part, "first phase shifting
means for causing a phase difference of B/2 between any twon
encoded signals adjacent to one another among the n encoded
signals."
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007