The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte YING B. YANG, KEIICHI NITO, and AKIO YASUDA ____________ Appeal No. 1999-1993 Application No. 08/385,702 ____________ ON BRIEF1 ____________ Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges. DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2 and 4- 13. Claim 3 has been indicated by the examiner to be directed to allowable subject matter. We REVERSE. 1This appeal has been decided on brief since appellants’ representative did not appear at the oral hearing scheduled for May 9, 2001.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007