The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte MARTIN KESSLER
________________
Appeal No. 1999-1998
Application 08/793,365
________________
HEARD: JUNE 12, 2001
________________
Before HAIRSTON, DIXON and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1,
2, 5 and 8 through 10. In an Amendment After Final (paper
number 14), claims 3, 4, 7 and 10 were amended. Claims 3, 4,
6, 7 and 11 through 18 have been allowed (paper number 17).
The disclosed invention relates to a circuit for
operating a DC electric motor, and for detecting an increased
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007