Ex parte HASHIMOTO et al. - Page 3




              Appeal No. 1999-2019                                                                                     
              Application No. 08/646,810                                                                               

                            a storage operable to store an image signal;                                               
                            a writing device which is operable to write an image signal in the storage;                
                            a reading device which is operable to read an image signal from the                        
                     storage;                                                                                          
                            a discriminator which discriminates whether a relative movement is                         
                     executed between the object and the image pickup device; and                                      
                            a controller which controls at least one of the writing and reading devices to             
                     perform at least one of writing and reading of image signal during a relative                     
                     movement, wherein the image pickup device is exposed after a relative movement                    
                     is completed.                                                                                     
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                  
              Kojima                             5,402,252                          Mar. 28, 1995                      
              Karasawa                           4-28187                            May 13, 1992                       
              (Japanese Examined Patent Publication)1                                                                  
                     Claims 1-11 and 13-44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                               
              unpatentable over Karasawa and Kojima.                                                                   
                     Claims 45-48 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by                         
              Karasawa.                                                                                                
                     We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 7) and the Examiner's Answer (Paper                    
              No. 14) for a statement of the examiner's position and to the Brief (Paper No. 13) and the               


                     The file contains a 5-page partial English translation, apparently provided by appellants with the1                                                                                                
              Information Disclosure Statement filed August 6, 1996 (Paper No. 3), although counsel for appellants was 
              unable to confirm such at the oral hearing.  We have obtained a complete translation of the document (on 
              which we rely) from the USPTO translation branch (translation dated June, 1999) and are enclosing a copy 
              with this decision.                                                                                      
                                                          -3-                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007