Ex parte DELARUELLE et al. - Page 11




          Appeal No. 1999-2050                                      Page 11           
          Application No. 08/576,544                                                  


               Ben-Efraim teaches the limitations.  Specifically, the                 
          reference discloses that "[a]fter a segment 34, 36, 38 or 40                
          is selected, the oldest symbol or data bit in the segment is                
          read out from the right end of the respective shift register,               
          a new symbol is written into the left end of the shift                      
          register, and all other symbols are shifted to the right."                  
          Col. 3, ll. 36-40 (emphasis added).                                         


               Accordingly, we are persuaded that Ben-Efraim discloses                
          the limitations that "the reading to and writing from memory                
          shifts the data through the memory locations of interleaved                 
          bit groups."  Therefore, we affirm the rejection of claims 9                
          as anticipated by Ben-Efraim.  Next, we address the                         
          indefiniteness rejection.                                                   


                         Indefiniteness Rejection of Claim 8                          
               We note the following principles.  “The test for                       
          definiteness is whether one skilled in the art would                        
          understand the bounds of the claim when read in light of the                
          specification.  If the claim read in light of the                           
          specification reasonably apprise[s] those skilled in the art                







Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007