Ex parte DELARUELLE et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1999-2050                                       Page 8           
          Application No. 08/576,544                                                  


               Regarding claim 6, the appellants argue, "Ben-Efraim does              
          not disclose 'data is both written to and read from memory                  
          during consecutive select line activations,' ...."  (Appeal                 
          Br. at 5.) Claim 6 specifies in pertinent part the following                
          limitations: "data is both written to and read from the memory              
          during consecutive select line activations ...."  Giving the                
          claim its broadest reasonable interpretation, the limitations               
          recite writing data to and reading data from the memory during              
          consecutive select line activations.                                        


               The examiner fails to show a teaching of the limitations               
          in Ben-Efraim.  To the contrary, he admits, "when the switch                
          52 activates one of the segments to write a data to one of the              
          shift register, the switch pointer 54 will activate the same                
          segment to read the same data which written into the shift                  
          register."  (Examiner's Answer at 7.)  For its part, the                    
          reference teaches that "[a]fter a segment 34, 36, 38 or 40 is               
          selected, the oldest symbol or data bit in the segment is read              
          out from the right end of the respective shift register, a new              
          symbol is written into the left end of the shift register, and              









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007