Ex parte DELARUELLE et al. - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                                 Paper No. 20         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                             Ex parte ANTOINE DELARUELLE                              
                            and FRANCISCUS A.M. VAN DE LAAR                           
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1999-2050                                 
                              Application No. 08/576,544                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before BARRETT, FLEMING, and BARRY, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                
          the  rejection of claims 1-9.  We affirm-in-part.                           


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The invention at issue in this appeal relates to memory                
          access during convolutional interleaving and deinterleaving of              
          data bits or symbols.  Specifically, during the activation of               
          a memory select line, data are both written to and read from                






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007