Ex parte MURATA - Page 6




              Appeal No. 1999-2051                                                                                         
              Application No. 08/716,615                                                                                   

              scope from claim 1, requires a function associated with the "quantization step size                          
              variation determiner" that the rejection fails to show in the reference.  In particular, claim 4             
              sets forth the limitation that the quantization step size variation is modified to be "(i) larger            
              if said quantization step size variation is positive and a large amount of motion is                         
              determined between a previous frame and a current frame and (ii) smaller if said                             
              quantization step size variation is negative and a small amount of motion is determined                      
              between the previous frame and the current frame."  We do not find any disclosure of these                   
              operations in the reference, and the examiner has not pointed out where the description                      
              might lie.  We therefore cannot sustain the section 102 rejection of claim 4, nor of claims 5                
              through 7 depending therefrom.                                                                               





















                                                            -6-                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007