Ex parte KANEKO et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1999-2058                                                        
          Application 08/433,643                                                      

                    image data storing means for storing image data; and              
                    memory means for two-dimensionally mapping and                    
               temporarily storing the image data stored in the image                 
               data storing means, wherein the image area specifying                  
               means is adapted to data-process the image data within an              
               image data area corresponding to an image area specified               
               thereby and stored in the memory means so that the image               
               area can be displayed on the display means with                        
               predetermined density.                                                 

               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
               Shiraishi et al. (Shiraishi)       4,777,597   October 11,             
          1988                                                                        
               Endo et al. (Endo)            5,012,521     April 30, 1991             
               Poulsen et al. (Poulsen)           5,194,949     March 16,             
          1993                                                                        
               Echerer et al. (Echerer)           5,384,862   January 24,             
          1995                                                                        
               Maayan et al. (Maayan), Computer Image Analysis of Kidney              
               Histopathological Sections, Int. J. Bio-Medical                        
               Computing, Vol. 10, No. 1, January 1979, pp. 23-28.                    
               Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being              
          unpatentable over Maayan and Poulsen.                                       
               Claims 2, 4, 5, 7, 13, and 14 stand rejected under                     
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Maayan, Poulsen,              
          and Endo.                                                                   
               Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                   
          being unpatentable over Maayan, Poulsen, Endo, and Echerer.                 



                                        - 5 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007