Ex parte KENMOCHI et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-2159                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/746,953                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants' invention relates to a disposable                      
          wipe-off article.  A copy of the claims under appeal is set                 
          forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                             


               The prior art of record relied upon by the examiner in                 
          rejecting the appealed claims is:                                           
          Balch et al. (Balch)          3,505,155                April 7,             
          1970                                                                        
          In addition, the examiner also relied upon Official Notice                  
          concerning heat-sealable bonding.                                           




               Claims 1 to 5 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as being unpatentable over Balch taken with Official Notice.                


               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and the appellants regarding the above-noted                
          rejection, we make reference to the answer (Paper No. 14,                   
          mailed November 16, 1998) for the examiner's complete                       
          reasoning in support of the rejection, and to the brief (Paper              
          No. 13, filed October 19, 1998) and reply brief (Paper No. 16,              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007