Ex parte KENMOCHI et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1999-2159                                       Page 4           
          Application No. 08/746,953                                                  


          have led one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the                    
          relevant teachings of the references to arrive at the claimed               
          invention.  See In re Fine, 837 F.2d 1071, 1074, 5 USPQ2d                   
          1596, 1598 (Fed. Cir. 1988) and In re Lintner, 458 F.2d 1013,               
          1016, 173 USPQ 560, 562 (CCPA 1972).                                        


               Claim 1, the sole independent claim on appeal recites a                
          disposable wipe-off article comprising, inter alia, a                       
          heat-sealable sheet and a heat-sealable wipe-off layer                      
          including an expanded bundle of continuous filaments.  Claim 1              
          further recites that the wipe-off layer is "bonded to the base              
          sheet [sic, the heat-sealable sheet] by a plurality of                      
          heat-seal lines extending to cross the continuous filaments                 
          and intermittently arranged longitudinally of the continuous                
          filaments."                                                                 


               Balch discloses (see, for example, column 2, lines 7-15)               
          a nonwoven continuous filament product which is formed into a               
          spread web and then is preferably dimensionally stabilized by               
          bonding and/or stitching and/or laminating the spread web to a              
          sheet material.  Balch teaches (column 4, lines 64-71) that a               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007