Ex parte DIRNE et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-2283                                                        
          Application No. 08/690,525                                                  


               The claimed invention relates to a magnetic head                       
          structure in which the head face is provided with a first                   
          corrosion insensitive material layer and a second layer of                  
          wear-resistant material which is more insensitive to corrosion              
          than the first material layer.  According to page 2 of                      
          Appellants’ specification, the second layer, which includes a               
          contact face for cooperation with a record carrier, protects                
          the magnetic head from abrasive and corrosive wear.                         
               Claim 11 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                 
          follows:1                                                                   
          11.  A magnetic head having a head face and comprising a head               
          structure provided with a transducing gap, said transducing                 
          gap terminating in said head face, different materials being                
          present in different areas of the head face, characterized in               
          that the head face is provided at the transducing gap and at                
          both sides thereof with a first layer of a material which is                
          more sensitive to corrosion than said materials of the head                 
          face, and the first layer is provided, at the transducing gap               
          and at both sides thereof, with a second layer of a wear-                   
          resistant material that is more insensitive to corrosion than               
          the material of the first layer.                                            
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        



               1Contrary to the Examiner’s indication at page 3 of the Answer, the    
          copy of claim 11 presented in the Appendix to Appellants’ Brief filed October
          14, 1997 (paper No. 29) is correct since it reflects the changes added by the
          amendment filed May 7, 1997 (Paper No. 25) after final rejection, which was 
          entered by the Examiner.                                                    
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007